Jakarta Globe, Amir
Tejo & Arientha Primanita, September 25, 2013
 |
Nanik, the 12-year old Orangutan from Surabaya zoo was seen shortly before
she died in the quarantine on Sept. 21, 2013. (JG Photo/Photo courtesy of
Surabaya Zoo’s Temporary Management Team)
|
An
endangered Bornean orangutan has died young at Indonesia’s notorious “zoo of
death” in Surabaya after succumbing to a tumor in her large intestine, the zoo
confirmed on Wednesday.
“The
autopsy result showed that there was a tumor in her large intestine,” Surabaya
Zoo spokesman Agus Supangkat said. “Her appetite had dropped drastically.”
Nanik, who
was also found to have liver problems, was found dead on Sept. 21 at the age of
12 — Bornean orangutans should live to around 60 in captivity.
Agus said a
group of veterinarians at the zoo had become aware of the animal’s health
problems around two months ago. Vets described the animal’s declining energy
levels and increasingly asthenic appearance before she was moved to the zoo’s
quarantine facility on Sept. 19.
Animal
doctors administered antibiotics, vitamins and an analgesic in quarantine but
Nanik made little progress in the following two days.
At 2:45 p.m
on Sept. 21, Nanik exhibited difficulties breathing. She died shortly after.
Indonesia’s
largest zoo has proved itself to be a macabre animal dungeon, incarcerating
some of the world’s most endangered species in shambolic squalor. A giraffe was
found dead with almost 20 kilos of plastic in its stomach. A steady diet of
formaldehyde-laced meat corroded a Sumatran tiger’s digestive tract. More than
150 pelicans lived cheek-by-bill in a pen no larger than a basketball court.
Komodo dragons went missing, an African lion died in pain.
The
Indonesian government was forced to take steps after the extent of the scandal
caught the attention of international media, from the Huffington Post to
London’s Daily Telegraph.
Agus was
keen to emphasize that the zoo had improved its practices over the last year,
and stressed that Nanik’s death was not attributable to the kind of willful
blindness of the zookeepers’ casual sadism that was imparted to animals in the
years before the zoo was brought to account.
“Like many
places, we also have issues,” he said. “But we have a standard for the animals’
food and we are now improving the treatment.”
Tony
Sumampau, a former member of the team drafted in to manage the crisis at the
zoo, was not able to comment on Nanik’s cause of death but warned that
conditions at the zoo were still far from acceptable.
“The number
of animal deaths could be avoided if the management really paid attention to
animal welfare,” he said. “They just conduct minimum renovations, such as
repairing cages or repainting… What they need to do right now is to totally
revamp the zoo to increase animal welfare.”
Agus
admitted progress had been slow.
“If we find
that some species suffer from overcrowding, we will improve and enlarge the
facilities for that species,” he said. “It is in accordance with the
improvement of the zoo. We have also improved water facilities for the animals.
We are increasing the clear water capacity from city’s water company — and we
have stopped using water from the city’s river.”
The issue
of overcrowding is more complicated than authorities would prefer.
“We have
offered some of the collection to other conservation institution,” Tony said.
“Some were accepted, but there were institutions who refused — seeing how
Surabaya zoo was managed. Others were afraid that the animals from Surabaya zoo
carried diseases.”
Data
acquired by the Jakarta Globe show 43 animal deaths at the zoo from several
species between July 15 to Sept . 17.
Agus,
however, said the zoo saw around 20 animals die per month.
“It is
because the animals are old or they have diseases,” he said. “It is all
natural causes.”
No comments:
Post a Comment